dc.contributor.author | Kask, Annika | |
dc.contributor.author | Põldver, Nele | |
dc.contributor.author | Ausmees, Liisi | |
dc.contributor.author | Kreegipuu, Kairi | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-10T19:25:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-10T19:25:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://datadoi.ee/handle/33/340 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.23673/re-282 | |
dc.description.abstract | The present study investigates how the brain automatically discriminates emotional schematic faces, as indicated by the mismatch responses, and how reliable these brain responses are. Thirty-three healthy volunteers participated in the vMMN EEG experiment with four experimental sets differing from each other by the type of standard (object with scrambled face features) and the type of deviants (Angry, Happy and Neutral schematic faces) presented. Conscious subjective evaluations of valence, arousal and attention catching of the same stimuli showed clear differentiation of emotional expressions. Deviant faces elicited rather similar vMMN at frontal and occipital sites. Bayesian analyses suggest that vMMN does not differ between angry and happy faces. Neutral faces, however, did not yield statistically significant vMMN at occipital leads. Pearson’s correlation and intra-class correlation analyses showed that the brain’s reactions to the stimuli were highly stable within individuals across the experimental sets, whereas the mismatch responses were much more variable. | en |
dc.relation | PRG770 | en |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |
dc.subject | visual mismatch response, vMMN, automatic visual processing, affective processing, schematic faces, reliability | en |
dc.title | Subjectively different emotional schematic faces not automatically discriminated from the brain’s bioelectrical responses | en |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/dataset | |